2006), discovering process inefficiencies and inconsistencies (Akman and Demirors 2009, observing project key indicators and computing correlation between product and process metrics (Sunindyo et al.
#Bugzilla download software#
Some of the business applications of process mining of software repositories are: uncovering runtime process models Kindler et al. Process mining of software repositories can provide Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) assessors with relevant information and can support existing software process assessment and improvement approaches (Samalikova et al. In this paper, we report a bug-xing process dataset for 30 Apache open-source projects that use JIRA bug tracking system for bug reporting.is real-world dataset is analyzed to discover the anomalous process sequences and the root cause of anomalies.e contributions of this paper include (i) a formalized approach for pre-processing and transforming the bug report history data, from bug tracking systems into event logs, suitable for process analysis (ii) a process mining based anomaly detection framework for bug-xing processes that comprises our proposed algorithms for process discovery and conformance checking and (iii) an artiicial labelled process dataset available at Mendeley open-source dataset repository ( In addition to these, the discrete sequence-based analogy and anomaly detection techniques are not discussed in the bug-xing process context. Also, they did not evaluate the performance of their proposed conformance checking algorithms. Existing research either uses process mining techniques or discrete sequence-based anomaly detection techniques.e bug-xing process of various open-source projects has been analyzed previously to discover the process ineeciencies using process mining techniques.ese works exploit generic process mining tools to create the process models. In the past few years, substantial research has been conducted to ond out the anomalies present in the real-world business processes.
#Bugzilla download code#
The provided taxonomy could provide a foundation for best practices and tool support to detect and avoid code review smells in practice. The empirical analysis shows that the OSS projects are substantially affected by the code review smells.
The empirical results illustrate that 72.2% of the code reviews among eight projects are affected by at least one code review smell. We observe that a considerable number of code review smells exist in all projects with varying degrees of ratios. To quantitatively demonstrate the existence of these smells, we analyze 226,292 code reviews collected from eight OSS projects. Based on this process, a taxonomy of code review smells is introduced. Then, we conduct a targeted survey with 32 experienced software practitioners and perform follow-up interviews in order to get their expert opinion. We first conduct a multivocal literature review in order to gather code review bad practices discussed in white and gray literature. The aim of this study is to provide an empirical understanding of the bad practices followed in the code review process, that are code review (CR) smells. Non-conformance of developers to this process does not only reduce the advantages of the code review but can also introduce waste in later stages of the software development. In spite of minor differences in different platforms, the primary purpose of all these rules and practices leads to a faster and more effective code review process. Although there is no consensus on a formally defined life cycle of the code review process, many companies and open source software (OSS) communities converge on common rules and best practices.
Code review is a crucial step of the software development life cycle in order to detect possible problems in source code before merging the changeset to the codebase.
0 kommentar(er)
